Optimization of Machining Parameters In A Turning Operation of Austenitic Stainless Steel To Minimize Surface Roughness And Tool Wear

Authors

  • Vijay Krishna Chaturvedi  P. G. Scholar, Department of mechanical engineering, C.V. Raman institute of science and technology, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
  • Nitin Shukla  Assistant Professor, Department of mechanical engineering, C.V. Raman institute of science and technology, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India

Keywords:

TiAlN, CCD, Talysurf, ANOVA

Abstract

The current study used a TiAlN coated carbide insert tool to turn on austenitic stainless steel of grade AISI 202. The primary purpose of the following research was to use Response Surface Methodology to evaluate the impact of machining parameters such cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut on the surface roughness of the machined material and tool wear. The purpose was to find the best machining parameters for the specified tool and work materials in the experiment's chosen domain in order to reduce surface roughness and tool wear. The experiment was carried out in a 20-run experiment matrix with a full-factorial Central Composite Design (CCD) (CCD). A Talysurf was used to quantify surface roughness, and a Toolmaker's microscope was used to measure tool wear. MINITAB ® 17 was used to compile the data for analysis. To develop and analyse the link between the machining parameters and the response variables (surface roughness and tool wear), the Response Surface Methodology was employed (RSM). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse the importance of these parameters on the response variables and to develop a regression equation for the response variables with the machining parameters as independent variables using a quadratic model. We obtained and evaluated ANOVA main effects and interaction graphs, as well as contour and 3-D surface plots. The quadratic models were found to be significant with p-values of 0.033 and 0.049. The findings revealed that feed had the greatest impact on surface roughness, followed by cutting speed and depth of cut, whereas depth of cut was shown to be the only significant factor affecting tool wear. The top three optimal settings for carrying out the machining were offered by Response Surface Optimizer, which are listed in the results section.

References

  1. Kumar, Kumar, G., (2013), “Multi Objective Optimization of Cutting and Geometric parameters in turning operation to Reduce Cutting forces and Surface Roughness,” B.Tech. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.
  2. Yang W.H. and Tarng Y.S., (1998), “Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on Taguchi method,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 84(1) pp.112–129.
  3. Makadia A.J. and Nanavati J.I., (2013), “Optimisation of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology,” Measurement, 46(4) pp.1521-1529.
  4. Neseli S., Yaldiz S. and Turkes E., (2011), “Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology,” Measurement, 44(3), pp. 80-587.
  5. Bouacha K., Yallese M.A., Mabrouki T. and Rigal J.F., (2010), “Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool,” International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 28(3), pp. 349-361.
  6. M.S. Lou, J.C. Chen and C.M. Li, (1999), “Surface roughness prediction technique for CNC end-milling,” Journal of Industrial Technology, 15(1).
  7. M.S. Lou and J.C. Chen, (1999), “In process surface roughness recognition system in end-milling operations,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15(1) pp. 200–209.
  8. Faisal, M.F.B.M., (2008), “Tool Wear Characterization of Carbide Cutting Tool Inserts coated with Titanium Nitride (TiN) in a Single Point Turning Operation of AISI D2 Steel,” B.Tech. thesis, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Mekala.
  9. Sharma V.K., Murtaza Q. and Garg S.K., (2010), “Response Surface Methodology and Taguchi Techniques to Optimization of C.N.C Turning Process,” International Journal of Production Technology, 1(1), pp. 13-31.
  10. Montgomery D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 1997.
  11. Noordin M.Y., Venkatesh V.C., Chan C.L. and Abdullah A., (2001), “Performance evaluation of cemented carbide tools in turning AISI 1010 steel,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 116(1) pp. 16–21.
  12. Trent, E. and Wright, P. Metal Cutting, 4th ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Woborn, MA, Chap 2.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-05

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Vijay Krishna Chaturvedi, Nitin Shukla, " Optimization of Machining Parameters In A Turning Operation of Austenitic Stainless Steel To Minimize Surface Roughness And Tool Wear, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Mechanical and Materials Engineering(IJSRMME), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp.74-91, March-April-2022.